Strategic Horizon 2030: AIU Launches Global Dialogue on the Future of Central Asia

Tue, Feb 3, 2026, 10:56 AM

The implementation of President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev's ambitious strategy to transform Kazakhstan into a key regional hub requires not only political efforts and infrastructure development but also adequate expert support.

 

Central Asia has become a crossroads of interests for many global powers. However, analytical infrastructure lags behind the diplomatic realities of the "Central Asia Plus" formats. The expert environment is fragmented or isolated from global networks. There is an excess of opinions but a deficit of trust, methodology, and institutional consistency.

 

A need emerged for a new type of independent analytical "think tank" operating at the intersection of politics, economics, and security, providing reliable, in-depth, and internationally recognized analysis about Central Asia — produced from within the region itself as an independent geo-economic and geopolitical hub.

 

As part of this vital task, Astana International University (AIU) initiated the creation of an intellectual bridge between Kazakhstan and the world's leading research centers. A practical step in this direction was the official launch of the independent platform CFive, established at AIU in partnership with prestigious organizations such as the Atlantic Council and the Caspian Policy Center. This partnership transforms the university into an epicenter of strategic thought, where academic knowledge merges with global politics.

 

On February 2 of this year, AIU hosted the forum "Central Asia 2030: Strategic Horizons and Regional Choices" on the basis of the CFive platform.

 

The event brought together representatives of government agencies, the diplomatic corps, international think tanks such as the Atlantic Council and the Caspian Policy Center, as well as the academic and expert communities. Participants discussed the transformation of Central Asia's role in the context of current geo-economic and geopolitical changes, as well as strategic horizons for the region's development until 2030.

 

The central theme of the discussion was the reimagining of regional connectivity — not as an alternative route, but as strategic infrastructure necessary to ensure economic sovereignty, sustainable growth, and long-term stability for Central Asian countries. It was noted that over the past year, Central Asian and Trans-Caspian countries have made significant progress in coordinating transport, logistics, customs, and digital systems, which previously seemed unrealistic.

 

Forum speakers included Erkin Tukumov (Special Representative of the President of the RK for Afghanistan), Zulfiya Suleimenova (Ambassador-at-Large, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the RK), Dauren Aben (Deputy Director of KazISS under the President of the RK), Sultan Yessenbek (Secretary General of the Benelux Chamber of Commerce in Kazakhstan), Andrew D’Anieri (Deputy Director of the Eurasia Center, Atlantic Council), Efgan Nifti (CEO, Caspian Policy Center, online), Iskander Akylbayev (Chairman of CFive), Aaro Ylitalo (Representative of the European Union in the RK), Samuel Mills (Head of Political and Communications Section, British Embassy), Beatriz Muñoz González (Deputy Head of Mission, Embassy of Spain), and Elias Oppenrieder (First Secretary of the Political Section, Embassy of the FRG). They noted that close coordination of logistical and digital systems over the past year has enabled a new level of regional integration. The CFive platform is intended to become a tool to help transform political declarations into concrete investment and technological projects.

 

U.S. Approach to Central Asia

 

During the discussion, it was emphasized that the U.S. consistently promotes a regional approach to interaction with Central Asia, viewing it as an independent strategic subject with its own agency and significance, rather than an object of foreign policy. For Washington, long-term commercial and investment projects are directly linked to regional stability, deepening cooperation between neighboring states, and the development of regional formats.

 

In this context, the C5+1 format was noted as the key framework for U.S. engagement with Central Asia. Holding the C5+1 summit at the level of heads of state in Washington was a significant event, especially considering the traditional orientation of American foreign policy toward bilateral formats.

 

It was noted that a potential visit by the U.S. President to the region is possible only in the presence of a "big deal" — a large-scale commercial or strategic project with clear and mutual benefits. Potential areas included the extraction of critical minerals, the development of transport and logistics connectivity, and major investment projects that go beyond symbolic initiatives.

 

Currently, Central Asia is viewed by Western and American investors as a reliable region due to macroeconomic stability and interest in sovereign debt. However, participants emphasized the need to move to the next stage — creating conditions for large-scale equity investments capable of ensuring sustainable economic effects for both regional countries and international partners.

 

Regional Institutionalization and New Priorities

 

Particular attention was paid to deepening regional institutionalization, including the formation of the C6 format (C5 + Azerbaijan), which expands Central Asia's strategic perimeter to the west and strengthens the region's collective bargaining position in interactions with external actors.

 

Energy and critical minerals were identified as new strategic priorities. Participants stressed the importance of transitioning from a raw material model to processing, creating added value, and integrating into global production chains related to green energy, electrification, and digital infrastructure. The Middle Corridor was viewed as a key tool for ensuring this transformation.

 

In conclusion, participants agreed that if 2025 was a year of strategic alignment, 2026 would be a test of implementation and effectiveness. Priorities include increasing the capacity of the Middle Corridor, eliminating infrastructure bottlenecks, moving from political declarations to practical results, and embedding regional cooperation into everyday management and trade practices.

 

The event confirmed the demand for CFive as a new independent analytical platform and a long-term venue for expert dialogue and international cooperation on the strategic future of Central Asia.

 

For students and faculty, CFive opens unique doors. They gain direct access to international analytics and the chance to conduct research alongside experts from Washington and Astana. AIU reaffirms its status as a next-generation research university, actively shaping the future of Kazakhstan as a leading intellectual hub.


112